Art and Science of PAR Survey Form Page Art and Science of PAR Survey Form HiddenNext Steps: Install the Survey Add-OnThis form requires the Gravity Forms Survey Add-On. Important: Delete this tip before you publish the form.Training Art and Science of PAR Co-Occuring Disorders Motivational Interviewing CRSW Boot Camp Ethical Considerations HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis Prevention Suicide Prevention Name(Required) First Last Email(Required) Instructor(Required)Joy MoodyJohn BurnsEileen DoyleJessica G. CarterCheryle PacapelliMichelle J. LennonJim WuelfingPriscilla Matos1. Ease of obtaining training information Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 2. Learning environment and meeting space Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 3. Handouts and materials Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 4. The trainer’s scope of knowledge Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 5. The quality of the training information Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 6. Effectiveness of the trainer to convey the information Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 7. Overall training quality Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 8. What did you find useful during this training?9. What did you find wasn't useful in this training?10. The Trainer(s) showed active & sincere Interest in understanding needs and perspective of learners? 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 11. Clarity of instructions: Delivery of instructions for activities were clear, articulate, & concise 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 12. Interactive Learning Environment 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 13. Rhythm & Flow: Keep the Learning Moving, steady pace; up-beat tempo 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 14. Debriefing: Integrates a debriefing process into all activities, Links key concepts into debriefing process 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 15. I have a stronger understanding of what it means to meet people where they are at as a result of this training. Much higher understanding Higher understanding Neither high nor low Not much understanding Didn't explain it enough to understand it al all 16. The trainer(s) created a space that felt safe to share and learn in. Very high quality High quality Neither high nor low quality Low quality Very low quality 17. I have a clearer understanding of recovery capital and recovery ecosystems. Extremely clear Very clear Somewhat clear Not so clear Not at all clear 18. I have a clear understanding of the roles of a peer recovery specialist. Extremely clear Very clear Somewhat clear Not so clear Not at all clear 19. I have a clearer understanding of ethics and boundaries as it relates to peer recovery. Extremely clear Very clear Somewhat clear Not so clear Not at all clear 20. The information on stigma, bias and discrimination was useful to me as it relates to peer recovery and cultural competence. Extremely useful Very useful Somewhat useful Not so useful Not at all useful 21. Any other comments or suggestions:22. Other training topics you would like offered:UntitledFirst ChoiceSecond ChoiceThird Choice Art and Science of PAR Survey Form HiddenNext Steps: Install the Survey Add-OnThis form requires the Gravity Forms Survey Add-On. Important: Delete this tip before you publish the form.Training Art and Science of PAR Co-Occuring Disorders Motivational Interviewing CRSW Boot Camp Ethical Considerations HIV, AIDS, and Hepatitis Prevention Suicide Prevention Name(Required) First Last Email(Required) Instructor(Required)Joy MoodyJohn BurnsEileen DoyleJessica G. CarterCheryle PacapelliMichelle J. LennonJim WuelfingPriscilla Matos1. Ease of obtaining training information Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 2. Learning environment and meeting space Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 3. Handouts and materials Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 4. The trainer’s scope of knowledge Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 5. The quality of the training information Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 6. Effectiveness of the trainer to convey the information Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 7. Overall training quality Excellent Above Average Average Below average Poor 8. What did you find useful during this training?9. What did you find wasn't useful in this training?10. The Trainer(s) showed active & sincere Interest in understanding needs and perspective of learners? 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 11. Clarity of instructions: Delivery of instructions for activities were clear, articulate, & concise 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 12. Interactive Learning Environment 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 13. Rhythm & Flow: Keep the Learning Moving, steady pace; up-beat tempo 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 14. Debriefing: Integrates a debriefing process into all activities, Links key concepts into debriefing process 1 Low 2 3 4 5 High 15. I have a stronger understanding of what it means to meet people where they are at as a result of this training. Much higher understanding Higher understanding Neither high nor low Not much understanding Didn't explain it enough to understand it al all 16. The trainer(s) created a space that felt safe to share and learn in. Very high quality High quality Neither high nor low quality Low quality Very low quality 17. I have a clearer understanding of recovery capital and recovery ecosystems. Extremely clear Very clear Somewhat clear Not so clear Not at all clear 18. I have a clear understanding of the roles of a peer recovery specialist. Extremely clear Very clear Somewhat clear Not so clear Not at all clear 19. I have a clearer understanding of ethics and boundaries as it relates to peer recovery. Extremely clear Very clear Somewhat clear Not so clear Not at all clear 20. The information on stigma, bias and discrimination was useful to me as it relates to peer recovery and cultural competence. Extremely useful Very useful Somewhat useful Not so useful Not at all useful 21. Any other comments or suggestions:22. Other training topics you would like offered:UntitledFirst ChoiceSecond ChoiceThird Choice
